fromhell
|
 |
« on: April 10, 2009, 09:51:52 PM » |
|
This is a stupid idea. Would there be any benefit on a reduced 'demo' version? Not necessarily as in 'selling' a full version, but as a convenient cut-down version with the popular essentials. Freedoom has a demo version. Nexuiz has reduced third-party releases that cut it to the 50mb mark. Maybe it'd be a benchmark version too
|
|
|
Logged
|
asking when OA3 will be done won't get OA3 done. Progress of OA3 currently occurs behind closed doors alone I do not provide technical support either.new code development on github
|
|
|
andrewj
Member
Cakes 24
Posts: 584
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: April 10, 2009, 10:38:05 PM » |
|
A cut-down version would not be able to connect to public servers, even non-pure servers would give lots of problems.
So what then, make a LAN-only "OA lite" version? Not worth the hassle imho.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Case
Member
Cakes -3
Posts: 175
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: April 10, 2009, 10:45:57 PM » |
|
no.
Does the oa486 version have a smaller footprint? You could also reduce memory by just compiling the client and I'm sure there are other things. The idea of a demo only works with nonfree proprietary products anyways.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jackoverfull
Member
Cakes 14
Posts: 384
Member
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: April 11, 2009, 11:57:42 AM » |
|
I don't think that a "demo version" would be a good idea.
It would mean no multiplayer or, worse, demo-limited multiplayer (thus further segmenting the player-base).
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fromhell
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: April 11, 2009, 12:04:03 PM » |
|
that's okay, i knew it was a dumb idea. i'm just asking for if there's any benefit in it
|
|
|
Logged
|
asking when OA3 will be done won't get OA3 done. Progress of OA3 currently occurs behind closed doors alone I do not provide technical support either.new code development on github
|
|
|
KILLIE THE GREAT
Lesser Nub
Cakes -6
Posts: 121
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: April 11, 2009, 12:11:36 PM » |
|
that's okay, i knew it was a dumb idea. i'm just asking for if there's any benefit in it
ummm... NO, no benefit
|
|
|
Logged
|
KHOTANAS.... They waste precious RSA currency on top class clothing, then burn & tear is days later
|
|
|
0kelvin
I LEFT THE FORUM BY EDITING ALL MY POSTS OUT!!! HAHAHA!!! TAKE THAT, INTERNET!
Half-Nub
Cakes -54
Posts: 87
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: April 11, 2009, 03:00:40 PM » |
|
openarena
|
|
« Last Edit: August 06, 2010, 01:14:07 PM by 0kelvin »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jackoverfull
Member
Cakes 14
Posts: 384
Member
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: April 11, 2009, 03:24:58 PM » |
|
Maybe a download pack with just the essential to run one map of each gametype and one skin.
And then?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Cacatoes
Banned for leasing own account
Posts a lot
Cakes 73
Posts: 1427
also banned for baiting another to violate rules
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: April 12, 2009, 05:28:06 AM » |
|
Then if it's 8MB download you've got a quick way to see if your system runs OA, to perform benchmarks, to give the gameplay a try .. Also, some guys are short in disk space or lazy to make some  Some non-proplayer guys may also like a quick way to make a few frags during their break. If you explain well you will only be able to join servers with *that map*, there is no need to remove the internet support or to split the community  They'd be kicked on map change, but it's better than nothing ... There could always be needs, the problem is, is it worth the effort ?
|
|
« Last Edit: April 12, 2009, 05:29:58 AM by Cacatoes »
|
Logged
|
Todo: Walk the cat.
|
|
|
jackoverfull
Member
Cakes 14
Posts: 384
Member
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: April 12, 2009, 06:03:38 AM » |
|
8 mb? The mac os x engine alone (no game, only the engine and its icon) is 10 mb…
the mac os x engine is a bit "fat", but i don't think that a demo would be less than 100 mb.
|
|
« Last Edit: April 12, 2009, 06:07:13 AM by jackoverfull »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
schumi_gr
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: April 12, 2009, 06:13:42 AM » |
|
Current version size is 300 MB ,so a demo would be nonsense.Cant w8 for 300 MB then damn this is 2009 ,get a better connection.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
KILLIE THE GREAT
Lesser Nub
Cakes -6
Posts: 121
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: April 12, 2009, 06:22:09 PM » |
|
Current version size is 300 MB ,so a demo would be nonsense.Cant w8 for 300 MB then damn this is 2009 ,get a better connection.
nOtE, some people want to test out things first, not just get the whole thing. PS: Your car is very powerful, but my car 101BHP more powerful and 33 mhp faster
|
|
|
Logged
|
KHOTANAS.... They waste precious RSA currency on top class clothing, then burn & tear is days later
|
|
|
pulchr
Member
Cakes 34
Posts: 625
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: April 12, 2009, 07:57:27 PM » |
|
yeh, but schumi would lap you anyway 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
vindimy
Bigger member
Cakes 15
Posts: 161
lolwut?
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: April 12, 2009, 10:26:57 PM » |
|
yeh, but schumi would lap you anyway  ROFL 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Neon_Knight
In the year 3000
 
Cakes 49
Posts: 3775
Trickster God.
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: April 13, 2009, 06:13:09 AM » |
|
yeh, but schumi would lap you anyway  ROFL  Owned. 
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Detailed" is nice, but if it gets in the way of clarity, it ceases being a nice addition and becomes a problem. - TVT Want to contribute? Read this.
|
|
|
feLiZ_naVidAD
Half-Nub
Cakes -2
Posts: 65
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: April 13, 2009, 07:52:07 AM » |
|
my answer....maybe...
its more time to keep it up to date 2 versions... that the most fundamental point i guess, since you are the only packer of everything
The demo version with just one model and less maps... maybe for the casual gamer who just want to try it out...
|
|
|
Logged
|
Whatever i say in this post is true unless fromhell said otherway. In that case I disagree with what I just wrote. I meant to write what fromhell said. ------- I also would like to add that im not a chick. I use this model coz i like the thong of the sorceress when i die (witch rarely happens) 
|
|
|
KILLIE THE GREAT
Lesser Nub
Cakes -6
Posts: 121
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: April 13, 2009, 09:39:50 AM » |
|
yeh, but schumi would lap you anyway  i know the veyron is heavyer, but F1 car, with schumi or not, won't do 253 MPH, only gets up to 220 MPH aand if u drive F1 CAR u,ll get out, on fire (terrifing car) veyron, u,ll come out steaming
|
|
« Last Edit: April 13, 2009, 09:42:22 AM by KILLIE THE GREAT »
|
Logged
|
KHOTANAS.... They waste precious RSA currency on top class clothing, then burn & tear is days later
|
|
|
schumi_gr
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: April 13, 2009, 02:50:12 PM » |
|
Speaking technically yes Veyron has higher top speed but takes more time to get there and slow down,also F1 can have much higher top with a much less downforce set up.But when talking for laps F1 is much faster in corner and acceleration so overall quicker at a lap.But this comparison has no meaning anyway.
P.S. sry for off-topic
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
KILLIE THE GREAT
Lesser Nub
Cakes -6
Posts: 121
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: April 13, 2009, 04:34:01 PM » |
|
Speaking technically yes Veyron has higher top speed but takes more time to get there and slow down,also F1 can have much higher top with a much less downforce set up.But when talking for laps F1 is much faster in corner and acceleration so overall quicker at a lap.But this comparison has no meaning anyway.
P.S. sry for off-topic
as far as i know Buggati Veyron does 0-60 2.7 Seconds f1 car, i think in 1.55, your right, and about cornering, it's built for circuits, 16.4 just as a very fast Grand tourer. either way BOTH ARE EPIC CARS apologies for off-topic talk
|
|
« Last Edit: April 13, 2009, 04:36:52 PM by KILLIE THE GREAT »
|
Logged
|
KHOTANAS.... They waste precious RSA currency on top class clothing, then burn & tear is days later
|
|
|
|