Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Legality of tributes of third-party maps  (Read 3429 times)
fromhell
Administrator
GET A LIFE!
**********

Cakes 35
Posts: 14520



WWW
« on: February 16, 2011, 08:52:57 PM »

I know tributing a commercial map may be a strong stride into grey territory, but what about third-party maps? Some of my favorite maps ever were third-party, but they, too can be copyrighted but they often have the opportunity for personal contact commercial maps can't offer.


What does anyone think about this?

p.s. some of the third party maps that were GPLed (aggressor, rpg3dm1) are exempt from this thread


« Last Edit: February 16, 2011, 09:36:45 PM by fromhell » Logged

asking when OA3 will be done won't get OA3 done.
Progress of OA3 currently occurs behind closed doors alone

I do not provide technical support either.

new code development on github
Neon_Knight
In the year 3000
***

Cakes 49
Posts: 3775


Trickster God.


« Reply #1 on: February 16, 2011, 10:24:58 PM »

I thought you shouldn't be bothered by that. If you do that from scratch (just like I did with oa_reptctf3, oa_reptctf11 and am_thornish, based on Q3's reptctf3, reptctf11 and UT's CTF-Thorns*) then you're the author of your own version.

Although letting the original author to notice your version would be a nice touch.
Logged


"Detailed" is nice, but if it gets in the way of clarity, it ceases being a nice addition and becomes a problem. - TVT
Want to contribute? Read this.
Gig
In the year 3000
***

Cakes 45
Posts: 4392


WWW
« Reply #2 on: February 17, 2011, 02:03:22 AM »

Well, I don't know about maps, but AFAIK, with images, making something too similar to something copyrighted (and if there is no license information, one should assume it is "all rights reserved") is still a "derivative work", and needs authorization.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Image_casebook
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Derivative_works
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Fan_art

I still hope that making something that resembles an existing map, but has got some differences, and is done from scratch, may be ok, but maybe the difference level may be an important factor.
Anyway, if there is a way to contact the original author, one may try to ask his permission to make a "remake" of it, or even to get himself re-publish the .map under the gplv2 license. If he answers "no", I suppose it is better to focus on other maps...
Logged

I never want to be aggressive, offensive or ironic with my posts. If you find something offending in my posts, read them again searching for a different mood there. If you still see something bad with them, please ask me infos. I can be wrong at times, but I never want to upset anyone.
chaoticsoldier
Member


Cakes 18
Posts: 375


This space intentionally left blank.


« Reply #3 on: February 17, 2011, 02:46:40 AM »

I pretty sure it would it be classed as a derivative work, even if you create from scratch.

You will most probably need the original author's permission. If you want to look into it, depending on the situation you might possibly be able to claim it is 'fair use', but otherwise it doesn't look feasible without the author's express permission because copyright still exists.
Logged

0101100101101111011101010010011101110110011001010010000001101010011101010111001101110100001000000111011101100001011100110111010001100101011001000010000001111001011011110111010101110010001000000111010001101001011011010110010100101110
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to: